Powered by Gottalife
During a thoroughly enjoyable discussion the other day I was told that I should not call myself a Christian unless I 'belong to a recognised, properly organised church'. Interesting!
My response was two-fold: first, that simple churches are properly organised and recognised by God, if not be some men; and second, that I don't care whether I am called a Christian or not. He could vaguely understand my first point, but was stunned by the second. But I meant it. The term 'Christian' has become tainted. It is no longer used in the biblical sense to identify people who are like little Christs.
I would rather be known as a 'Jesus loony', 'a God botherer', or whatever other silly phrases people choose to use of avowed followers of The Way. In other words, I want people to be challenged by Jesus when they meet me, not accept me as 'one of that lot who go to church'. When I am asked about my religion I have stopped replying, 'Christian,' and say something like, 'I don't have a religion. I'm a follower of Jesus.'
Part of me thinks that I'm just being picky about the language and that it sounds rather pompous and pious. (I hope that my accompanying smile tells people that I'm not really being pompous.) I'd be very interested to know other people's thoughts on this subject.
Blessings to one and all!
John
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Jim London on May 27, 2011 at 11:23am
Permalink Reply by John Tyler on May 27, 2011 at 11:57am Nicely put, Jim! That's rather what I meant about the name being tainted.
You almost raise another issue that interests me. I can't help but notice how many people I know refer to 'God', 'Christ', their church, famous authors, etc., but almost never refer to 'Jesus'. There's definitely something in a name! In fact, this has just given me an idea. I think I'll start regularly asking people why they use almost any name or reference other than 'Jesus'. Could be fun.
Permalink Reply by Jim London on May 27, 2011 at 12:03pm
Permalink Reply by John Tyler on May 27, 2011 at 12:10pm
Permalink Reply by Mark Collings on May 27, 2011 at 9:39pm
Permalink Reply by Jimmy Nduruchi on May 29, 2011 at 1:50pm The term “Christian” is perhaps most misplaced in Africa than anywhere else in the world. When colonialists came to Africa, they considered everything African ‘satanic’ and embarked on changing everything. And, I should intimate that they succeeded resoundingly, and that’s why I am called “Jimmy”. Here, all these western names are called “Christian names” even when they are not found in the bible. Thus “Helen” is a Christian name and “Nduruchi” is not Christian. I think this is where “Christianity” started gaining a pejorative tint especially amongst the African elite. Later with the competition amongst “Christians” and Muslims, those who did not want to be called Ms called themselves Christians without necessarily identifying themselves with the person of Jesus Christ or knowing who He really was/is. Consequently, everyone who is not a Muslim in Kenya, for instance, is a “Christian”. Even the traditional practitioners call themselves so. That’s why I have also been running away from this slanderous aphorism that has been used by the devil to try to defile the infallible name of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Permalink Reply by John Tyler on May 29, 2011 at 4:03pm That is a really interesting point of view, Jimmy. Certainly in UK, one of the common arguments used by people opposed to Jesus is, 'Look at all the terrible things done by Christians!' They generally then refer to the crusades, which were around 7-800 years ago. But the whole episode of European/'Christian' formal colonialism from 1500AD right up till the 1970s would often be a better example for such people to quote. This period, as with ancient Rome, saw the often-deliberate twisting of Jesus' work and message for the benefit of the state.Sadly, ordinary people, for their own benefit were (and still are) only too happy to go along with it. 'The prophets prophesy lies, the priests rule by their own authority, and my people love it this way.' (Jeremiah) Things don't change much do they?!
Change of subject... It's lovely to be able to discuss things with brethren in Kenya, USA and everywhere else around the globe. Blessing to all of you!
Permalink Reply by Jimmy Nduruchi on May 30, 2011 at 2:37am Yes John,
It is interesting how people are only too happy to flow and dance with happiness in things they have found in existence no matter how ridiculously flawed they are. Yes, you are right about the two glaring historical goofs extended by “Christianity”. The crusades and colonialism. The type of gospel that was brought to Africa from Vasco da Gama in 1498 A.D. to the collapse of the apartheid regime in 1994 A.D. was colonial and subjugative in essence, style and vision. The gospel was used to rule people with an iron fist. Humility and submission to authority was stressed. Through this they put the masses in the crucible of slavery and committed all atrocities and managed to get away with it. In fact to date, Africans are among the most “humble” and “submissive” people on earth. Majority of the people think that questioning things is of the devil. That’s why they allow corruption from governments and bow at the lordship of corrupt ministers in the so-called churches. After a big scandal has been committed either by church or state and people want to raise their voices in protest, you will hear over radio and TV, “Let’s pray for them. The Lord will deal with their corruption. They will not enter the kingdom of heaven.” Okay, this is true, but does it mean then that we don’t seek prosecution for them? And this way, in Kenya for example, nobody has ever gone to jail for stealing money since independence from Britain, almost 50 years ago. You will be amazed at how wealthy a few people are and the vast majority who wallow in abjectivity. And yet all of these people meet in the ‘church’ as ‘Christians’. And the ‘minister’ has to give a message that is relevant to both groups. I lived in South Africa for some years and when I got there, I was surprised to find big churches for the people who perpetrated the apartheid system. Isn’t it interesting that even the apartheid system was “Christian” in nature? Africans too had their own churches, but both the oppressors and the oppressed were called by the same name, “Christians”.
John I do the same thing here in California. I say, "I'm a follower of Jesus of Nazareth," since there have been so many false Christs.
If someone says, "Are you a Christian?" I would have to ask, "What do you mean by 'Christian'?"
What strange times we live in, heh?
Permalink Reply by John Tyler on May 30, 2011 at 10:34am Strange indeed!
Good point about Nazereth. I'd never really thought of that, although funnily enough I often find myself referring to 'Jesus of Nazereth'. On one occasion, I felt very strongly that I had to use this title when commanding a sickness away, and I now seem to do it a lot. Whether it's spiritually led or just habit I honestly couldn't say. But I like your reasoning anyway.
Jonathon Baer replied to Jo Lynne Deaver's discussion Don't Limit Opportunities
Jo Lynne Deaver posted a discussion
Marvin Lorenzana posted a status
Mark McCune left a comment for Jo Lynne Deaver
Jo Lynne Deaver left a comment for Pam Potoczek
Jo Lynne Deaver left a comment for Mark McCune
Jo Lynne Deaver left a comment for Rick Swenson
Jo Lynne Deaver left a comment for JoeJennifer Filer
John Tyler posted a blog post
Pablo Giacopelli posted a blog post
Jo Lynne Deaver posted a status© 2012 Created by Gottalife.